Dear EarthTalk: How do green groups feel about the new 2012 Farm Bill draft recently released by the Senate??Roger Wheeler, Miami
Like so much of the legislation coming out of Washington, D.C., green groups are mixed on the new Farm Bill now making its way toward a floor vote. No doubt there are some conservation bright spots in the bill, but the question is: Are there enough and do they go far enough?
The non-profit Environmental Working Group (EWG) doesn?t think so. ?Unfortunately, the bill ... will do more harm than good,? says Craig Cox, an agriculture and natural resources expert at EWG. ?It needlessly sacrifices conservation and feeding assistance programs to finance unlimited insurance subsidies and a new entitlement program for highly profitable farm businesses.? Cox is critical of the new bill for essentially replacing one subsidy to large successful farms (those which need it least) with another: ?Rather than simply ending the widely discredited direct payment program, the Senate Agriculture Committee has created an expensive new entitlement program that guarantees most of the income of farm businesses already enjoying record profits.? He calls replacing direct payments with a revenue guarantee program ?a cynical game of bait-and-switch that should be rejected by Congress.?
On the conservation side, Cox is dismayed that the draft bill fails to address ?the impact of fence-row to fence-row agricultural production, which is putting unprecedented pressure on our land, water and wildlife.? EWG would like to see the bill include language forcing farmers to protect critical wetlands and grasslands, not to mention soil health in general, in exchange for getting the insurance subsidies. ?In combination, a new entitlement program, unlimited secret insurance subsidies, cuts to conservation programs and high commodity prices will create powerful incentives to plow up fragile wetlands and grasslands and erase many of the environmental gains made by agriculture in recent years,? says Cox.
On the plus side, Cox applauds provisions in the bill that create and expand programs supporting healthy diets and organic farmers, as well as those that seek to expand links between local farmers and consumers. ?We also support efforts to reform conservation programs to get more conservation bang for the buck,? he concludes, adding that EWG hopes to work with legislators on strengthening the bill?s conservation and nutrition provisions, and to place sensible limits on subsidies for highly-profitable farms.
Another respected non-profit, American Farmland Trust (AFT), is more bullish overall on the Senate?s draft of the bill. The group likes the fact that funding for conservation programs is maintained at all, given the sour economic climate and resistance to put funds into non-emergency programs. AFT also praises the bill for its commitment to support farm and ranch land protection through a new permanent Agricultural Land Easement option which will help protect working lands and keep them in agricultural use.
?Our nation has a critical need to protect farm and ranch land,? says AFT president Jon Scholl, adding that the U.S. lost farm and ranch acreage equal to the size of Indiana over the last 30 years. ?Permanent conservation easements protect agricultural land from development, safeguard local agricultural economies and help farmers and ranchers transition their land to the next generation.?
A vote on the final version of the bill could come as early as this summer.
CONTACTS: EWG, www.ewg.org, AFT, www.farmland.org.
EarthTalk? is written and edited by Roddy Scheer and Doug Moss and is a registered trademark of E - The Environmental Magazine (www.emagazine.com). Send questions to: earthtalk@emagazine.com. Subscribe: www.emagazine.com/subscribe. Free Trial Issue: www.emagazine.com/trial.
Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=9c74cf0d6af28bd1194cba5a3044cc22
internal revenue service intc ipad mini andrew shaw christina aguilera tupac hologram
No comments:
Post a Comment